A few days ago, I was watching a debate on the existence of God between John Lennox (a Christian and professor of Mathematics at Oxford University) and Peter Atkins (an atheist and professor of Chemistry at Oxford University). It was a very different setting than usual debates in the sense that it was a “live” recording and there was no immediate audience to cater towards. This is what I like. A simple discussion without seeking to please and impress a crowd. It is clear that Richard Dawkins feeds off of a thronged setting. The same could be said of the late Christopher Hitchens. Because the setting of the Lennox and Atkins debate was nothing short of simplified, I enjoyed it all the more. Indeed, Pet...